(no subject)
Aug. 18th, 2007 09:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I saw somewhere that Diana Wynne Jones had been less than approving of Harry Potter, considering that Rowling had nicked her stuff. What was it though? What I think of as DWJ's motif—related parallel/alternate worlds—is absent from Harry Potter, and Harry's magic feels different, more codified.
Perhaps DWJ was reading the Draco Trilogy by mistake? She's really got a case there.
Perhaps DWJ was reading the Draco Trilogy by mistake? She's really got a case there.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-19 09:35 pm (UTC)I never managed to get more than about three chapters into the Draco Trilogy before wandering off to do something else, so I can't comment about that.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 12:03 pm (UTC)In the Draco Trilogy Harry and Draco are both Super Speshul Wizards (TM) known as Magids. I was reminded of this when I was reading The Merlin Conspiracy.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 12:08 pm (UTC)Ooh, thinking about Deep Secret and The Merlin Conspiracy - both JKR and DWJ have centaurs in their books. But it's hardly as if either of them have a monopoly.
ps
Date: 2007-08-20 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 09:01 pm (UTC)Re: ps
Date: 2007-08-20 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 09:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 04:47 pm (UTC)That may be what I was thinking of. One can see why she would find it extremely annoying. Whoever made the accusation was not only rubbish at checking relative publishing dates, but ignorant of the many books about young wizards & witches at school or otherwise, that turn up in British kidlit.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 04:49 pm (UTC)