owl: David Tennant eeps so prettily (eep)
[personal profile] owl
THEY'R IN UR LJ TRAKIN UR STATS

I've just been to the console and set stats disable to 1 like it says in the entry.

Date: 2007-09-17 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carissa-lynn.livejournal.com
I'm fairly familiar with the web (I'm a web designer), and I have to say this is not really a big deal. Since they own the servers, they already have access to this type of information. They're just organizing it, is all.

And stats are stats, not content. They pose very little threat to your privacy.

Date: 2007-09-17 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snarkel.livejournal.com
I wish they'd give us a stat tracking feature already. :P

But yeah, overall this is fairly harmless stuff.

Date: 2007-09-18 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sunshine-queen.livejournal.com
Thanks for the heads up!

Date: 2007-09-18 12:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rj-anderson.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm not really feeling the lack of privacy here. But thanks for the heads-up anyway -- it was amusing reading the comments.

It's really no big deal

Date: 2007-09-18 06:47 am (UTC)
ext_18076: Nikita looking smoking in shades (Default)
From: [identity profile] leia-naberrie.livejournal.com
They already have access to it anyway, they're just trying to make use of the information. I actually like the idea of stats. I'd love to have some sort of hit counter for my LJ.

Date: 2007-09-18 07:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] legionseagle.livejournal.com
It looks like they've just about managed to bring themselves within the relevant law (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20032426.htm) (of course, being LJ they wouldn't give a damn about whether they were compliant with EU law or not, since they don't believe the rest of the world exists) but I've disabled the stats in any event. I was particularly annoyed by the fact that they announced this in [livejournal.com profile] lj_biz where I wouldn't have found it had it not been for you mentioning it, and by their announcement that among the stats that they'd be collecting weren't merely the on-site statistics but details about where one went after leaving the site. Given their evident belief that the TOS allow one to be suspended for linkage to off-site content, I think they're preparing to take this one a step further.

Date: 2007-09-18 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ankaret.livejournal.com
I very seldom leave LJ for anywhere as I tend to just open new tabs and close old ones instead, but I'm guessing they can also follow 'open link in new tab'?

Except that I've turned the stats off for my main LJ, and will get round to turning them off for the fic LJ when I'm next logged in as it.

Date: 2007-09-18 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] legionseagle.livejournal.com
Well that might - just might - be because they're using data-mining software (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,383524,00.asp).

The rehview of Omniture SiteCatalyst linked to has the headline "SiteCatalyst Tracts What Web Shoppers Are Doing and promises
Once your site is wired to SiteCatalyst, you can analyse traffic and all kinds of commerce statistics. With a great many default parameters, this package supplies infomation on everything from basics like page views (available from hourly to yearly periods) to referring sites and search engines to in-depth breakdowns of your custo

Date: 2007-09-18 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] legionseagle.livejournal.com
Sorry - posted too soon. "customer's browsers". Essentially this tool is too complicated and expensive for the limited ro le we're told it's being deployed for; it promises, according to its makers, real-time analysis on an IP- address level of site "visitor" behaviour.

Date: 2007-09-18 08:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carissa-lynn.livejournal.com
I don't think they can ban you for that because they won't be able to know it was you...just someone visiting your page.

Where does it say they track where you go when you leave LJ? The only way I think they'd know is if you clicked on a link from LJ. From that post, and the posts here, I don't see that it collects any different information than the stats I use on my sites (which come with the hosting package so there is nothing nefarious going on there) except that it might match it up to your IP.

It's certainly within your rights to be cautious, though, and understand your decision to opt out. I just look at it as nothing you do on the internet is particularly private anyway (you know your ISP keeps up with everything right?), so this announcement doesn't trouble me.

Date: 2007-09-18 09:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anstruther.livejournal.com
Thanks for the tip-off. Like most posters here, I'm not that bothered about them knowing where I've been on LJ, but the thought of them following me on to the web is a bit off-putting...

Date: 2007-09-19 07:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] legionseagle.livejournal.com
Well, admittedly it's probably only those pinkos at the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB112248279507797567-Vjb1yq7Q_XKy8jZDQn8BGMiA_KA_20050829.html?mod=tff_article) scaremongering, but this account of Omniture's use of what is, in essence, spyware to aid their corporate customers target their marketing efforts more effectively (which, cutting through the [livejournal.com profile] lj_biz flannel, is what's going on here; they're looking to find more effective ways to make money out of us) means that I'm certainly not alone in being concerned about this.

Profile

owl: Stylized barn owl (Default)
only a sinner saved by grace

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829 3031   

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 10:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit