The new Pride and Prejudice
Sep. 17th, 2005 04:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
owlI saw it with ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
elerrina_amanya the other day. The main problem I had with it was the length; too many things had to be left out, including most of the Wickham plot, which means there was no red herring for Elizabeth. And Lydia's elopement must have come completely from left field for anyone who hadn't read the book.
The Bennets in one way were too nice (Mary wasn't snooty enough, and Lydia and Kitty were giggly rather than flirty. Even Mrs Bennet was toned down a few notches.), apart from the eavesdropping. On Bingley's proposal and all! I'm surprised he didn't flee then and there. Diffident!Bingley was rather funny and likeable, if not exactly canon, and you could really see the good side of Darcy in the second half of the film. I liked Charlotte Lucas as well, the actress got across her plight of an unmarried 27-year-old in a way that the BBC didn't really.
Miss Bingley's actress I can't quite place—some UK soap? I wasn't convinced by her sleeveless ballgown; it kept looking like her corsets to me. And on the subject of clothes, why was there so much nightclothes interaction? Darcy's motive for hand-delivering his letter (much curtailed, of course, in the film) was probably to avoid the servants' gossip, which would have been achieved really well by visiting her in her bedroom after she had retired. Oh, and Mr Bennet talks about powdering his hair or something in the book, whereas in the film he didn't even seem to shave. And the Bennets are more close to their farm than the Bingleys, but I can't believe that they and their visitors would have walked through it every time they went out of the house.
Oh, and could someone please cast Lydia as a blonde or something, so that I don't have to spend the first ten minutes wondering which is Kiity and which is Lydia?
But I did enjoy the film, although it was no substitute for the book, or the beloved BBC version. Very nice visually—and for the making of icons, of course. I've done a few bases myself.
Teasers:
1. 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. 9.
10.
11. 12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Comment, credit, and if you make icons out of them, I'd be interested to see them.
elerrina_amanya the other day. The main problem I had with it was the length; too many things had to be left out, including most of the Wickham plot, which means there was no red herring for Elizabeth. And Lydia's elopement must have come completely from left field for anyone who hadn't read the book.The Bennets in one way were too nice (Mary wasn't snooty enough, and Lydia and Kitty were giggly rather than flirty. Even Mrs Bennet was toned down a few notches.), apart from the eavesdropping. On Bingley's proposal and all! I'm surprised he didn't flee then and there. Diffident!Bingley was rather funny and likeable, if not exactly canon, and you could really see the good side of Darcy in the second half of the film. I liked Charlotte Lucas as well, the actress got across her plight of an unmarried 27-year-old in a way that the BBC didn't really.
Miss Bingley's actress I can't quite place—some UK soap? I wasn't convinced by her sleeveless ballgown; it kept looking like her corsets to me. And on the subject of clothes, why was there so much nightclothes interaction? Darcy's motive for hand-delivering his letter (much curtailed, of course, in the film) was probably to avoid the servants' gossip, which would have been achieved really well by visiting her in her bedroom after she had retired. Oh, and Mr Bennet talks about powdering his hair or something in the book, whereas in the film he didn't even seem to shave. And the Bennets are more close to their farm than the Bingleys, but I can't believe that they and their visitors would have walked through it every time they went out of the house.
Oh, and could someone please cast Lydia as a blonde or something, so that I don't have to spend the first ten minutes wondering which is Kiity and which is Lydia?
But I did enjoy the film, although it was no substitute for the book, or the beloved BBC version. Very nice visually—and for the making of icons, of course. I've done a few bases myself.
Teasers:
1.
2. 3. 4. 5.6.
7. 8. 9. 10.11.
12. 13. 14. 15.16.
17. 18. 19. 20.21.
22. 23. 24. 25.Comment, credit, and if you make icons out of them, I'd be interested to see them.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 04:33 pm (UTC)P.S.: How did you get to see the movie? It's not coming out in the UK until the 23rd, and not in the US until November! Lucky lady!
♥ Christine
no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 05:27 pm (UTC)I've always confused Kitty and Lydia...until I finally saw the BBC one as a whole. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-17 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-18 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-20 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-26 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-01 06:35 pm (UTC)