Little niggly things
Apr. 11th, 2007 09:55 pmDoes anyone else have Life on Mars (the song) really really stuck in their heads now?
And is it just me, or is LJ being cranky tonight? I expect the usual suspects are busily discussing Anna Nicole Smith's baby again. *glares at
ohnotheydidnt*
Question: who is the woman in this promo for Gridlock? IMDB is being extremely unhelpful, and I think I've seen her somewhere and it's annoying me.
And is it just me, or is LJ being cranky tonight? I expect the usual suspects are busily discussing Anna Nicole Smith's baby again. *glares at
Question: who is the woman in this promo for Gridlock? IMDB is being extremely unhelpful, and I think I've seen her somewhere and it's annoying me.
And this series' thing will be...
Apr. 10th, 2007 08:26 pm( THAT spoiler for later in Series 3 )
Last ever Life on Mars tonight. I wonder if I'll be brave enough to watch it live.
Last ever Life on Mars tonight. I wonder if I'll be brave enough to watch it live.
Oh, ITV, what's the rush?
Apr. 10th, 2007 06:18 pmYesterday we did a great deal of cleaning and tidying—the stairs haven't been so clean in months—and also a slight book cull. We have finally convinced the parents that what we need is not fewer books but another bookcase, and they say we can get an Argos one this week. There is not such thing as too many books, only too few bookshelves.
I also sat down and watched the tapes of the ITV Austen adaptations.
Mansfield Park: First mistake was casting Billie Piper as Fanny. Emma Woodhouse, certainly, Elizabeth Bennett, perhaps, Fanny Price, definitely not. Once you have Billie Piper, playing her as shy and delicate becomes difficult. So instead she ran and skipped and giggled all over the place. When sir Thomas said his line about William finding his sister at 18 too little changed from his sister at 10, I remarked, "Yes, she still hasn't learnt to use a hairbrush." I don't think she had her hair (which mysterious didn't match her eyebrows) tidy or a bonnet on her head throughout. Speaking of costuming, could we ever have an Austen adaptation that knows the difference between and evening and a morning dress, or doesn't have the heroine running and even riding without coat or hat? And the Bertram boys seemed to have a bit of difficulty in getting fully dressed before they left their rooms, too. And what on earth was up with that waltz at the end? Fanny and Edmund waltzing, WHAT?
Mansfield Park is a great long book; squashing it down to less than two hours was never going to be satisfying. I could see why they removed Mr Yeats, and thus Julia's elopement, and the trip to Rushworth's house, but I can't see why Fanny's coming-out ball was changed to a picnic, or why she was left alone at Mansfield instead of being sent back to Portsmouth in disgrace. I know that's it's an irresistible temptation to expand on the book's conclusion and how Edmund noticed the giant anvils dropping all round him, but it did make him look even more gormless than when he was in love with Mary.
The Crawfords were pretty good, though, and Maria, and Lady Bertram before she inexplicably woke up and played matchmaker at the end. And Edmund and Fanny managed to have chemistry while still being believable that he was in love with Mary.
Northanger Abbey: As this is the shortest of the books, it suffered the last from the compression, IMO. Catherine was played by an age-appropriate actress, and was very sweet and convincing. Henry was really quite fanciable, too. The one thing I didn't like was having Isabella sleep with Captain Tilney—she had much to good an eye for the main chance to do that. It made her seem a victim, as well, and Captain Tilney much worse than in the book. I hadn't realised those novels that Catherine was reading were quite so dodgy, either.
Persuasion: This is my favourite of the novels, and I don't think that any adaptation could satisfy me. This one was definitely too short, giving me the impression of a mad rush. For instance, Anne's little nephew has his fall while they are dressing for dinner, and Charles and Mary go off before the surgeon is fairly out of the door. The conclusion was a sort of hybrid of the cancelled and final ending of the book (Jane Austen changed it for a reason, you know), and takes place while all the characters seem to be running all over Bath (hatless, of course) only to end up back where they started. I liked Anne, though—and Captain Spooks was most attractive. I thought they did the explaining the backstory—most necessary in Persuasion—pretty well, too. I can't help wishing, though, that it had been twice the length, the Bath part especially.
I also sat down and watched the tapes of the ITV Austen adaptations.
Mansfield Park: First mistake was casting Billie Piper as Fanny. Emma Woodhouse, certainly, Elizabeth Bennett, perhaps, Fanny Price, definitely not. Once you have Billie Piper, playing her as shy and delicate becomes difficult. So instead she ran and skipped and giggled all over the place. When sir Thomas said his line about William finding his sister at 18 too little changed from his sister at 10, I remarked, "Yes, she still hasn't learnt to use a hairbrush." I don't think she had her hair (which mysterious didn't match her eyebrows) tidy or a bonnet on her head throughout. Speaking of costuming, could we ever have an Austen adaptation that knows the difference between and evening and a morning dress, or doesn't have the heroine running and even riding without coat or hat? And the Bertram boys seemed to have a bit of difficulty in getting fully dressed before they left their rooms, too. And what on earth was up with that waltz at the end? Fanny and Edmund waltzing, WHAT?
Mansfield Park is a great long book; squashing it down to less than two hours was never going to be satisfying. I could see why they removed Mr Yeats, and thus Julia's elopement, and the trip to Rushworth's house, but I can't see why Fanny's coming-out ball was changed to a picnic, or why she was left alone at Mansfield instead of being sent back to Portsmouth in disgrace. I know that's it's an irresistible temptation to expand on the book's conclusion and how Edmund noticed the giant anvils dropping all round him, but it did make him look even more gormless than when he was in love with Mary.
The Crawfords were pretty good, though, and Maria, and Lady Bertram before she inexplicably woke up and played matchmaker at the end. And Edmund and Fanny managed to have chemistry while still being believable that he was in love with Mary.
Northanger Abbey: As this is the shortest of the books, it suffered the last from the compression, IMO. Catherine was played by an age-appropriate actress, and was very sweet and convincing. Henry was really quite fanciable, too. The one thing I didn't like was having Isabella sleep with Captain Tilney—she had much to good an eye for the main chance to do that. It made her seem a victim, as well, and Captain Tilney much worse than in the book. I hadn't realised those novels that Catherine was reading were quite so dodgy, either.
Persuasion: This is my favourite of the novels, and I don't think that any adaptation could satisfy me. This one was definitely too short, giving me the impression of a mad rush. For instance, Anne's little nephew has his fall while they are dressing for dinner, and Charles and Mary go off before the surgeon is fairly out of the door. The conclusion was a sort of hybrid of the cancelled and final ending of the book (Jane Austen changed it for a reason, you know), and takes place while all the characters seem to be running all over Bath (hatless, of course) only to end up back where they started. I liked Anne, though—and Captain Spooks was most attractive. I thought they did the explaining the backstory—most necessary in Persuasion—pretty well, too. I can't help wishing, though, that it had been twice the length, the Bath part especially.
The Shakespeare Code
Apr. 7th, 2007 09:23 pmMy review, spoilers under cut.
( Once more into the breach, dear friends )
They're pushing next week back to 7:40 because of the football, bother them.
( Once more into the breach, dear friends )
They're pushing next week back to 7:40 because of the football, bother them.
I was changing my Gmail password to make it more secure, and now it's so secure that no-one can get into it, including me (I can't remember what special characters I put in).
I got an email sent to my secondary email, but I've checked all my other accounts and it didn't come to any of them, and you can't get in to try your security questions for 5 days. I hope I can remember them...
I got an email sent to my secondary email, but I've checked all my other accounts and it didn't come to any of them, and you can't get in to try your security questions for 5 days. I hope I can remember them...
(no subject)
Apr. 4th, 2007 06:24 pmApparently the Doctor spent 15 years as a postman. He was evidently delivering the letters in Belfast this week, as I got one at work yesterday dated 28 of March 2008.
Either that or it's the Ankh-Morpork Post Office with their arcane letter-sorting machine.
I was at the dentist today and happily, no fillings. He de-plaque-d them though, owow.
Either that or it's the Ankh-Morpork Post Office with their arcane letter-sorting machine.
I was at the dentist today and happily, no fillings. He de-plaque-d them though, owow.
There's one thing about the current series of Doctor Who that's getting a little annoying. The Doctor can visit anywhere, but the time where the companion comes from is always exactly contemporaneous with the air dates, even whenever it screws up things, as with Rose's missing year. I have no doubt that Martha's brother was born in 1986 (goodness, so young!). Aliens of London, the Christmas Invasion and the Cybermen invasion are all in her recent past, even though all those plus an uneventful year have happened since Rose stepped inside the TARDIS in 2005.
I can see why they do it: helps audience identification, plus they don't have to keep straight what order all the alien invasions happened in. But realistically it must be at least 2008. And Torchwood ought to be running parallel to this series, not 2006 as it's dated on some of the props. That's back when Nine was still around!
I can see why they do it: helps audience identification, plus they don't have to keep straight what order all the alien invasions happened in. But realistically it must be at least 2008. And Torchwood ought to be running parallel to this series, not 2006 as it's dated on some of the props. That's back when Nine was still around!
Don't kill Harry, please
Apr. 2nd, 2007 09:07 pmI was reading PoA at the weekend, and I was feeling very fond of the Trio, so I thought as I do occasionally, "I hope that none of them die in Book Seven", when I hit me. Book Seven is written, and people other than JKR know what happens in it. If any of them do die, they're already dead; it's irrevocable.
I'm not sure now if the chapter-by-chapter re-read up until the last minute is such a good idea after all. Perhaps I should try to distance myself from the characters and story so that if any of them do die, it won't come as so much of shock. (and them what? Pack off all seven books and send them to Oxfam, who'll find them impossible to sell.)
In other news, why deos fanfiction.net insist on sending you new chapter notification emails for your own stories? Yes, I know there's a new chapter up, I put it there 30 seconds ago and I'm looking at it now.
The bad thing about this new username is that it's not unique; there's a thewhiteowl already at Xanga and Myspace, and several websites, according to Google. With jediowl, I was fairly sure that all or most of the hits were mine. Ah, well.
I'm not sure now if the chapter-by-chapter re-read up until the last minute is such a good idea after all. Perhaps I should try to distance myself from the characters and story so that if any of them do die, it won't come as so much of shock. (and them what? Pack off all seven books and send them to Oxfam, who'll find them impossible to sell.)
In other news, why deos fanfiction.net insist on sending you new chapter notification emails for your own stories? Yes, I know there's a new chapter up, I put it there 30 seconds ago and I'm looking at it now.
The bad thing about this new username is that it's not unique; there's a thewhiteowl already at Xanga and Myspace, and several websites, according to Google. With jediowl, I was fairly sure that all or most of the hits were mine. Ah, well.
(no subject)
Mar. 31st, 2007 10:51 amI am becoming a little tired of the publicity referring to Martha as 'the first black companion'. Wo, look how enlightened casting directors are in 2007. And what about poor Mickey? He was in the TARDIS the same length of time as Jack was, and do people discount Jack as a companion?
And, no, "he doesn't count/is a racist stereotype because he's a bit pathetic" makes me wonder if the speaker ignored Mickey totally after Rose. Mickey had a far better companion's arc than Rose did! He started out a bit pathetic and became amazing; she started out pretty ordinary and became a bit pathetic.
Having said that, I shall be displeased if the TARDIS lands in Prohibition America and Martha is treated exactly as if she were white. New Who isn't big on historical accuracy (note the random French aristocrat extra played by a black actor in Girl in the Fireplace, not to mention the costuming and some of the dialogue; "We are French"? "My lover, the King of France"?? Don't even mention the Scottish ninja monks), nor was it too great at characterising Rose as not white middle-class female, but there you have your audience-identification character, and why bother making all this fuss about her being black if she's going to be levelled off to Everywoman?
What's the betting that the fact she's a medical student gets completely forgotten after the second episode, too? I want to see some science from Martha, and she's intelligent and educated, it would be nice to see her lines written that way.
And, no, "he doesn't count/is a racist stereotype because he's a bit pathetic" makes me wonder if the speaker ignored Mickey totally after Rose. Mickey had a far better companion's arc than Rose did! He started out a bit pathetic and became amazing; she started out pretty ordinary and became a bit pathetic.
Having said that, I shall be displeased if the TARDIS lands in Prohibition America and Martha is treated exactly as if she were white. New Who isn't big on historical accuracy (note the random French aristocrat extra played by a black actor in Girl in the Fireplace, not to mention the costuming and some of the dialogue; "We are French"? "My lover, the King of France"?? Don't even mention the Scottish ninja monks), nor was it too great at characterising Rose as not white middle-class female, but there you have your audience-identification character, and why bother making all this fuss about her being black if she's going to be levelled off to Everywoman?
What's the betting that the fact she's a medical student gets completely forgotten after the second episode, too? I want to see some science from Martha, and she's intelligent and educated, it would be nice to see her lines written that way.
Well, I did it
Mar. 30th, 2007 10:42 pmI went for the compromise option. What d'you think? I rather like it :D
(This is the ex-jediowl; I can't do a proper lj tag as it will automatically change to the new name:
jediowl, thus. Isn't that nifty?)
(This is the ex-jediowl; I can't do a proper lj tag as it will automatically change to the new name:
(no subject)
Mar. 28th, 2007 09:12 pmCover art for DH! Can't be bothered linking it; try Leaky if you're the 1.2 people on the internet who haven't yet seen it. I actually like the US version better than the UK; I think the Trio's faces look weird and too old for 17 in the UK one, but I suppose I'll get the children's version because I have for the first six.
It seems to me that my bank is a little crazy. Inside the envelope is a PIN; Outside the envelope is 'For the attention of Account number 12345678'. And the name and address of the account holder, seeing as it's posted to you. That's all you need for a withdrawal slip, and they'll give you £50 with no bank card or ID if you know the number.
It seems to me that my bank is a little crazy. Inside the envelope is a PIN; Outside the envelope is 'For the attention of Account number 12345678'. And the name and address of the account holder, seeing as it's posted to you. That's all you need for a withdrawal slip, and they'll give you £50 with no bank card or ID if you know the number.
Point of book etiquette
Mar. 26th, 2007 10:01 pmFor what length of time is it permissible to keep a borrowed book? The book in question is a mass market paperback of about 350 pages. I've had it for about 10 days already and I haven't had time to start it.
Ton that subject, is it just me, or are American mass market paperbacks of poorer quality than British ones? I've bought American editions of SF books off amazon, and nearly all of them have ink that smudges like newsprint (Baen Books, that's you I'm looking at), or text that is misaligned so that it's running down into the spine or off the edge of the page.
Somewhat to my surprise, it appears that the Assembly is actually going to assemble.
Ton that subject, is it just me, or are American mass market paperbacks of poorer quality than British ones? I've bought American editions of SF books off amazon, and nearly all of them have ink that smudges like newsprint (Baen Books, that's you I'm looking at), or text that is misaligned so that it's running down into the spine or off the edge of the page.
Somewhat to my surprise, it appears that the Assembly is actually going to assemble.
(no subject)
Mar. 24th, 2007 07:59 pmIt was a beautiful spring day today. Mam and I planted some primroses.
It's nice to see the sun out, but I don't like it in a way because it means time is passing and I still don't have a proper job.
Recruitment Agency #2 has been bought out by an English company. I hope we don't lose our leave like the last time. I must have at least a week by now.
It's nice to see the sun out, but I don't like it in a way because it means time is passing and I still don't have a proper job.
Recruitment Agency #2 has been bought out by an English company. I hope we don't lose our leave like the last time. I must have at least a week by now.
The week in television
Mar. 24th, 2007 03:08 pmWell, not the whole week, but Tuesday and Thursday anyway.
Life on Mars
Plasticine Sam is cute! The Beeb should make merchandise versions. In fact, they should do a whole episode in animated format.
House
Start of episode: he walks! He runs! He skateboards! Something is not right here....Oh, he's being sarcastic, it's ok, he hasn't been replaced by an ET House-clone.
In between: Patient's family: What's that injection? Cuddy: It's magic potion. I like to call it "0 to 60 in ten seconds".
End of episode: Oh, bad House. If you were a GP you would have booted yourself off your list by now.
Life on Mars
Plasticine Sam is cute! The Beeb should make merchandise versions. In fact, they should do a whole episode in animated format.
House
Start of episode: he walks! He runs! He skateboards! Something is not right here....Oh, he's being sarcastic, it's ok, he hasn't been replaced by an ET House-clone.
In between: Patient's family: What's that injection? Cuddy: It's magic potion. I like to call it "0 to 60 in ten seconds".
End of episode: Oh, bad House. If you were a GP you would have booted yourself off your list by now.
Memory Charms
Mar. 21st, 2007 09:41 pmHas anyone else noticed that there seems to be a conflict of sorts between CoS and GoF?
It's those Memory Charms. In GoF they seem only to remove the memory of a specific recent event, leaving the rest of the mind more or less intact, whereas in CoS it gives the subject total amnesia—and Lockhart still has no memory in OotP. It doesn't seem to be caused by Ron's malfunctioning wand, either, because Lockhart was planning to tell the Hogwarts staff that Ron and Harry lost their minds at the sight of Ginny's body. And as far as I recall he uses Obliviate, same like in GoF.
Does that mean all Lockhart's victims are going about like stroke patients? Ugh.
So, Flint or not? Any way to reconcile it?
It's those Memory Charms. In GoF they seem only to remove the memory of a specific recent event, leaving the rest of the mind more or less intact, whereas in CoS it gives the subject total amnesia—and Lockhart still has no memory in OotP. It doesn't seem to be caused by Ron's malfunctioning wand, either, because Lockhart was planning to tell the Hogwarts staff that Ron and Harry lost their minds at the sight of Ginny's body. And as far as I recall he uses Obliviate, same like in GoF.
Does that mean all Lockhart's victims are going about like stroke patients? Ugh.
So, Flint or not? Any way to reconcile it?